MA versus Medicare FFS
Two errors practices make constantly:
- Assuming Medicare enrollment covers MA. It does not. Each MA plan requires its own contract and credentialing.
- Assuming Medicare’s 12-month filing limit applies. It does not. MA filing limits are contractual and frequently far shorter. Record each plan’s limit from your contract.
The major MA plans
Humana, UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, Elevance/Anthem, Centene (Wellcare), Kaiser, and a large number of regional and provider-sponsored plans. Market share varies enormously by county.Enrollment
Per plan, generally requiring Medicare enrollment as a prerequisite plus a plan-specific contract and credentialing. Most pull from CAQH.Prior authorization
MA plans use prior authorization far more heavily than Medicare FFS. This is the operational difference most practices feel first.- Build a per-plan auth-required list into scheduling
- Track authorized units against delivered units
- Use peer-to-peer review when authorization is denied
Appeals
The plan’s internal reconsideration, then the federal Medicare Advantage appeals process — which involves an independent review entity and further levels. The track differs from both commercial appeals and Medicare FFS appeals.Risk adjustment
MA plans are paid risk-adjusted capitated amounts by CMS based on enrollee diagnoses. Consequences for practices:- Documentation and diagnosis coding specificity matter more to MA plans than to commercial payers
- Plans may run chart review programs and request records
- Some groups enter risk-sharing arrangements with MA plans — see Medical groups for why those complicate the MSO-PC structure
Quirks worth knowing
- D-SNPs (dual eligible special needs plans) involve both Medicare and Medicaid rules
- Network adequacy varies by county; panels can be closed
- Rates are typically benchmarked to Medicare but negotiated