The segment map
Annotated example
Reading it
BPR*I*214.60*C*ACH*CCP*... I = remittance information with payment. Total payment $214.60. C = credit. ACH with CCP = the ACH CCD+ format used for health care EFT. The remaining elements carry the originating and receiving bank routing and account numbers and the effective date 20260903.
TRN*1*ABC20260901001*1234567890 The reassociation trace number ABC20260901001. This value appears in the ACH addenda record of the corresponding EFT. This is how you match the deposit to this remittance.
CLP*PATACCT001*1*480.00*215.82*53.95*CI*CLAIMCTRL9876*11
SVC*HC:99213:25*285.00*118.66**1 Service line: CPT 99213 with modifier 25, charged 118.66**, 1 unit.
CAS*CO*45*136.68 Adjustment: group code CO (contractual obligation), CARC 45 (charge exceeds fee arrangement), $136.68. Write this off — you cannot bill the patient.
CAS*PR*2*29.66 Group code PR (patient responsibility), CARC 2 (coinsurance), $29.66. Bill the patient.
PLB*1234567890*20261231*WO:CLAIMCTRL5432*1.22 Provider-level adjustment: WO = overpayment recovery, recouping $1.22 against prior claim CLAIMCTRL5432.
Tying the remittance to the deposit
The worked arithmetic:
The EFT for $214.60 will carry
ABC20260901001 in its ACH addenda record.
Sum of claim payments ± PLB = BPR total = the deposit. If that equation doesn’t hold, stop and find out why before posting. See Reconcile payments daily.
Claim status codes (CLP02)
Status
4 routes to the denial queue. Status 22 unwinds a payment you already posted.
PLB reason codes
Why one 835 is not one deposit
Four independent reasons:- Aggregation, a payer may combine several remittances into one deposit
- Splitting, a large remittance may settle across multiple payments
- PLB, shifts the total away from the sum of claims
- Method, paper checks and virtual credit cards arrive on entirely different timelines than the 835
TRN, never by matching dollar amounts. Amount-matching works until two payers send similar amounts on the same day.