The federation model
A contract with one Blue is not a contract with another.
Expanding from Colorado to Arizona means a new contract with a different company — new application, new credentialing, new EDI/ERA/EFT, different rates, different policies, different payer IDs, different portal.
This surprises groups expanding out of a Blue-dominated market, and it is one of the largest hidden costs in multi-state expansion. See Enroll with payers, again.
Why the Blues matter disproportionately
In many local markets, the Blue plan is the single largest commercial payer. For a practice choosing its first payer to enroll with, the local Blue is frequently the right answer on market share alone. See The US payer landscape.BlueCard — home and host
BlueCard lets you bill your local Blue for a member of an out-of-area Blue.
Practically: submit to your local Blue as you would any other claim. The plans reconcile between themselves.
BlueCard handles the travelling patient. It does not substitute for network participation where you have an office. A group opening a location in a new state must contract with that state’s Blue.
BlueCard claims can also adjudicate more slowly than local claims, and the remittance may carry both plans’ identifiers. Build that into your AR follow-up expectations.
Finding your Blue
Start at the BCBS Association plan finder, then go to that company’s own provider site. Do not assume the national site’s guidance applies to your local plan.Enrollment and credentialing
Per plan. Most pull from CAQH — authorize each Blue separately in the clinician’s profile.Quirks worth knowing
- Alpha prefixes. Blue member IDs carry a three-character alpha prefix identifying the home plan. Omitting or mistyping it is a very common cause of CARC 31 rejections.
- Federal Employee Program (FEP) is administered through the Blues and has its own rules
- Payer IDs differ per Blue and are clearinghouse-specific
- Policies differ per Blue — a medical policy from one Blue does not control another