Prerequisites
- Every entity formed with its own EIN
- A decision on your naming convention
- Clarity on who the PC’s authorized officer is
The account map
Per PC
For the MSO
Naming convention
Decide once and never deviate:Signing authority
Visibility vs control
These are different axes, and only one is a compliance question. Read-only visibility across all entities creates no CPOM exposure — nobody’s receipts or clinical judgment are controlled by someone seeing a balance. Withdrawal authority is the constrained thing. So: maximize visibility, constrain control. Give the MSO’s finance team read access to everything and withdrawal authority over nothing on the PC side.How commingling actually happens
Not through fraud. Through convenience.Steps
Write the account map before opening anything
Apply the naming convention from account one
Set signers per the table above
Provision read-only access broadly, withdrawal authority narrowly
Issue per-entity payment cards, labeled
Store per-entity check stock separately, physically
Document the map and add it to the per-entity setup runbook
Review access quarterly
Cash concentration, carefully
Groups with meaningful balances want to concentrate idle cash for yield. The constraints:- PC cash moves to the MSO only as an invoiced management fee or a documented loan repayment, never as an automated sweep
- Each PC retains enough to cover clinical payroll and direct obligations
- No structure may give the MSO withdrawal authority over PC accounts
- Automated sweeps between differently owned entities are the pattern to avoid — the automation is what reads as control
Verify it worked
- Account map documented before opening
- Naming convention applied consistently
- PC signers are PC officers; no MSO signers on PC accounts
- Read-only access provisioned across all entities
- No standing sweep or ACH debit authority for the MSO
- Per-entity cards and check stock, physically separated
- Setup runbook written
- Quarterly access review scheduled