Skip to main content
A payer audit is a request to justify claims you have already been paid for. The response determines whether you keep the money. Deadlines are strict, first responses matter, and extrapolation can turn a small sample into a very large demand. Engage counsel before responding to anything beyond a routine records request. For a subpoena, a civil investigative demand, or any government inquiry, stop and call counsel before responding at all. What you say first shapes everything after. See When to call a lawyer.

Know which kind you have

UPIC, SIU, OIG, and DOJ are different in kind, not degree. These are fraud investigations. Treat any contact from them as a counsel matter from the first letter, including the decision about what to produce.

Steps

1

Log it the day it arrives

Date received, payer, auditor, claims at issue, deadline, and the response method required. Assign an owner immediately.Audit letters are frequently sent to an address nobody monitors, and the deadline runs from the letter date. Make sure your correspondence addresses are watched.
2

Calendar the deadline with a lead time

Missing an audit deadline generally means automatic adverse determination — you lose by default, on claims you might have defended easily.
3

Determine whether counsel is needed

4

Pull the records requested, and only those

Send exactly what was asked for, for exactly the claims and dates specified.For each claim, typically: the clinical documentation supporting the service, the physician signature and credentials, orders and referrals, the authorization, and the itemized bill.
Do not send more than requested. Extra records expand the audit’s scope and can surface issues on claims that weren’t under review.Do not alter or add to records. Late-signed notes, addenda created after the request, and any modification to an existing entry are the single most damaging thing you can do — it converts a documentation dispute into a fraud allegation. If a note is unsigned, say so.
5

Review before sending

Have someone qualified read every chart against the code billed. You want to know what the auditor will find before they find it.If you discover a genuine overpayment, that is an identification, and for Medicare and Medicaid the 60-day report-and-return clock starts. Discuss with counsel how to handle it in the context of the audit. See Report and return overpayments.
6

Submit properly, with proof

Use the required method. Include a cover letter indexing what you sent, organized by claim. Number the pages. Keep a complete copy of exactly what you submitted, and retain delivery confirmation.
7

Respond to the findings

Findings letters usually offer an appeal or rebuttal window that is short. Review every disputed claim individually — auditors make errors, and a well-documented rebuttal on a subset frequently reduces the demand materially.

Extrapolation

The mechanism that turns a modest audit into an existential one. An auditor reviews a sample of claims, calculates an error rate, and extrapolates it across the entire universe of similar claims in the audit period. A 30-claim sample with a 40% error rate can produce a demand covering thousands of claims. Grounds on which extrapolation is commonly challenged:
  • Sampling methodology, was the sample properly random and statistically valid?
  • Universe definition, were the claims in the universe genuinely similar to those sampled?
  • Sample size, too small to support the precision claimed
  • Error determinations, if individual errors are overturned on appeal, the extrapolation must be recalculated
  • Statutory and program requirements for when extrapolation may be used at all
Extrapolation challenges are specialist work requiring a statistician as well as counsel. If extrapolation is on the table, the cost of expert help is almost always less than the demand. Do not attempt this alone.

While the audit runs

  • Do not change your billing practices in a way that looks like concealment. Do fix genuine problems, and document that you fixed them.
  • Preserve everything. Institute a litigation hold if counsel advises.
  • Limit internal communication about the audit; discuss through counsel where privilege matters.
  • Keep operating. Prepayment review affects cash flow — plan for it.

After it closes

1

Root-cause every sustained finding

Documentation gaps, coding errors, missing authorizations, or an actual compliance problem.
2

Fix the process, not just the claims

3

Consider whether the finding implies broader exposure

If the audit found a systematic error, similar claims outside the audit period may also be overpayments, which triggers the 60-day analysis. Counsel decides how to handle this.
4

Document the remediation

A demonstrated corrective action is what reduces exposure on the next audit.

Verify it worked

  • Audit logged with owner and deadline on arrival
  • Correspondence addresses monitored
  • Counsel engaged where the type warrants it
  • Exactly the records requested, nothing more
  • No records altered or created after the request
  • Internal review completed before submission
  • Indexed cover letter; complete copy retained; delivery confirmed
  • Findings reviewed claim by claim
  • Extrapolation challenged with expert support where applicable
  • Root causes fixed and documented